{"id":2594,"date":"2025-11-24T05:22:22","date_gmt":"2025-11-24T05:22:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/handaldunaway.com\/?p=2594"},"modified":"2025-11-24T05:22:26","modified_gmt":"2025-11-24T05:22:26","slug":"why-the-premier-league-salary-cap-is-unethical","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/handaldunaway.com\/pt\/why-the-premier-league-salary-cap-is-unethical\/","title":{"rendered":"Why The New Premier League Salary Cap Is Unethical"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Premier League\u2019s approval of the Squad Cost Ratio (SCR), its new salary cap, is not a measure to enhance competitive balance. It is more likely a strategy by club owners to improve the investment profile of their franchises by compressing labor costs and making player-related expenditures more predictable for institutional capital.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The new ratio limits clubs to spending 85% of revenues on wages and agent commissions, with only temporary exceptions. In effect, it imposes limits on player compensation while placing no comparable constraints on what owners can earn or how much their ownership shares can be valued at.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The league and the owners are advertising this as a move for competitive balance in an attempt to sway public opinion, but in practice it limits the earning potential of players in the name of a principle they themselves do not follow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EPL\u2019s New Salary Cap, Explained<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Three proposals were reviewed, two passed and one, a leaguewide spending cap focused on competitive balance, was rejected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"Premier
Source: Handal Dunaway Research, Capology, Spotrac.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

This decision arrives at a time when wages are already stagnating in real terms. According to Handal Dunaway\u2019s 2025 English Premier League Compensation Report\u2122<\/a><\/mark><\/strong>, median guaranteed compensation stands at $3.5 million for the 2025 to 2026 season and has grown at a 4.0% annual rate in nominal terms over the last 5 seasons, which is lower than the rate of inflation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Owners, meanwhile, have seen their ownership shares appreciate at more than 20% per year over the same period, as recent club acquisitions have revealed. Those club owners, seemingly in an attempt to capitalize on the growing appeal of sports teams as acquisition targets for Private Equity and institutional investors, are placing limitations on how much they compensate the athletes that were indispensable to that value creation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Inflation Has Consumed Wage Growth in the League<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The compensation trend illustrates the real issue. Even as wages rose in nominal terms across the last 5 seasons, the increases were outweighed by broader economic conditions. Compensation grew at a 4.0% annual growth rate but did not keep pace with the roughly 4.5% annualized inflation rate in the United Kingdom over the same period.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Players are being asked to accept wage caps precisely when their real earnings are declining. A wage cap introduced in this environment is not a tool for competitive balance. It is but another mechanism that protects ownership interests and enhances potential exits through institutional capital.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EPL Player Median Guaranteed Compensation Growth<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

2021\/2022 \u2013 2025\/2026 Seasons<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"Bar
Source: Handal Dunaway Research, Capology, Spotrac.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

A Salary Cap That Protects the Existing Hierarchy<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The club-by-club compensation data shows a league already defined by significant structural inequality. Manchester City\u2019s median guaranteed compensation reaches $10.5 million, and Arsenal sits at $9.8 million, while clubs like Bournemouth and Sunderland operate at far lower levels. These gaps are longstanding features of the Premier League\u2019s commercial landscape and reflect global brand power, international fan bases, and decades of accumulated commercial infrastructure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The salary cap as approved does nothing to reduce these disparities, and owners rejected a separate proposal that would have balanced the spending capacity of the wealthier teams with the smaller ones.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By tying wage spending to revenues, the cap locks the existing order in place. Larger clubs retain their financial and competitive advantages while smaller clubs remain constrained. Nothing in the new system redistributes opportunity or compresses the financial distance between teams.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rather, it seems the competitive balance argument is a false flag onto which owners are hiding behind. The goal instead seems to be an attempt at replicating the US sports model of more controlled and predictable spending.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The move goes against the free-market principles that have long reigned in European football. Furthermore, it is likely an abuse of monopoly power that will invite governmental scrutiny, especially considering the stricter monopoly regulations in the UK compared to more lenient US laws.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EPL Median Guaranteed Compensation by Club<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

2025\/2026 Season<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"Grid
Source: Handal Dunaway Research, Capology, Spotrac.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n